I believe more savvy people will buy HD DVD (unless purely for data archival) since it costs less and looks very slightly better in most cases due to Blu Ray's rampant use of an inferior codec and single sided media.
All that stuff aside, I don't want to foot the bill for the more expensive Blu Ray stuff since it's a known fact that their manufacturing process is way more expensive.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I believe more savvy people will buy HD DVD (unless purely for data archival) since it costs less and looks very slightly better in most cases due to Blu Ray's rampant use of an inferior codec and single sided media.
All that stuff aside, I don't want to foot the bill for the more expensive Blu Ray stuff since it's a known fact that their manufacturing process is way more expensive.
I believe more savvy people will see your comments as nothing but FUD, and see sense that Blu-ray will end up being the inevitable winner.
@jensen - Blu Ray's rampant use of an inferior codec and single sided media -
Dude, you need to get of that crazy shit you are smoking.
Most of my Bluray discs if not all, currently 30 titles use either AVC video codec (Best), or the slightly inferior VC-1 with uncompressed audio.
Stop spreading FUD.