B&O were the only ones who might (once) have rivaled Apple for design kudos, but were always too elitist and, frankly, slow. This is a case in point: there is no need for physical buttons, just a touch screen.
Look at the bottom part of the remote...The "ball" that is supposed to sit in your hand. That is where the buttons are.
PS: I would have to agree on the design comments. B&O has some very slick gear but it certainly has a very niche market due to the price point and the fact that some of their designs aren't entirely practical...But then again, when you've got that kind of money to spend, who cares about practical!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Scooter @ Sep 6th 2007 10:36AM
B&O were the only ones who might (once) have rivaled Apple for design kudos, but were always too elitist and, frankly, slow. This is a case in point: there is no need for physical buttons, just a touch screen.
Shane @ Sep 6th 2007 10:54AM
Look at the bottom part of the remote...The "ball" that is supposed to sit in your hand. That is where the buttons are.
PS: I would have to agree on the design comments. B&O has some very slick gear but it certainly has a very niche market due to the price point and the fact that some of their designs aren't entirely practical...But then again, when you've got that kind of money to spend, who cares about practical!