My question is if they can do reliable HD wireless such as this, why the heck do wifi networks suck so much? Generally speaking consumer level wifi hardware isn't really that great... and I don't need the bandwidth you would need for 1080p. But I could really use the low latency and reliability you would need say with a wireless 1080p projector.
I'm thinking that they're designed for systems in a media rack under or next to a tv. sure its a lot more information, but what if its only traveling 3 feet? If your wireless N connection drops 3 feet away from your router with regularity, then your complaint is legit and I sympathize.
But it says it can reach up to ~100 feet...I'm sure it's all theoretical, and CAN work that far if and only if certain conditions are met (Like say, you're in a vacuum and have nothing but that equipment in the room...).
Loved the description of a dust bunny apocalypse btw.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
My question is if they can do reliable HD wireless such as this, why the heck do wifi networks suck so much? Generally speaking consumer level wifi hardware isn't really that great... and I don't need the bandwidth you would need for 1080p. But I could really use the low latency and reliability you would need say with a wireless 1080p projector.
agreed..this is some sort of con game.
I'm thinking that they're designed for systems in a media rack under or next to a tv. sure its a lot more information, but what if its only traveling 3 feet? If your wireless N connection drops 3 feet away from your router with regularity, then your complaint is legit and I sympathize.
But it says it can reach up to ~100 feet...I'm sure it's all theoretical, and CAN work that far if and only if certain conditions are met (Like say, you're in a vacuum and have nothing but that equipment in the room...).
Loved the description of a dust bunny apocalypse btw.