HD-DVD appealed to me, more because the discs/players were usually cheaper, and they include more interactive multimedia features in them.
Plus, I barely notice a difference in picture. They both look great. Although people say that BluRay can has more capacity, I've heard that HD-DVD can add extra layers to match up with that.
But if the market picks one side soon, we'll at least get somewhere.
You forgot to mention that since Blu-ray discs are superior to HD-DVD discs capacity-wise, they'll probably start stuffing a lot more into each disc. Hell, just think of the home user who'll be able to stuff several movies into one BD.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I have no idea how blue ray even took off, the quality is the EXACT same as HD-DVD and the players are hundreds of dollars more
Yeah, I agree.
HD-DVD appealed to me, more because the discs/players were usually cheaper, and they include more interactive multimedia features in them.
Plus, I barely notice a difference in picture. They both look great. Although people say that BluRay can has more capacity, I've heard that HD-DVD can add extra layers to match up with that.
But if the market picks one side soon, we'll at least get somewhere.
How it took off? Its called the PS3. Also blu ray movies are generally cheaper.
You forgot to mention that since Blu-ray discs are superior to HD-DVD discs capacity-wise, they'll probably start stuffing a lot more into each disc. Hell, just think of the home user who'll be able to stuff several movies into one BD.
@ funtownarcade
It's also called Sony Pictures