that has got to be one the ugliest remotes I have seen. I mean a little bit curves on this thing wouldnt have killed them. I can't believe in 2007 they can come up with such an ugly design. Aesthetics people Aesthetics!!
I am sorry but most remotes today have standard set of features which are kinda given. Functionality is of course important but so is the look. This remote is even a bother to hold for someone like me who has relatively small hands. Also, the feature set of this remote is pretty much on par for its price range. So my point was why cant they make it look a bit more interesting and comfortable to hold. At least the logitech remotes have a curved shape which is comfortable to hold. This thing is plain fugly.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Arnie @ Jul 28th 2007 3:36AM
that has got to be one the ugliest remotes I have seen. I mean a little bit curves on this thing wouldnt have killed them.
I can't believe in 2007 they can come up with such an ugly design.
Aesthetics people Aesthetics!!
BSW @ Jul 28th 2007 4:16AM
Disagree completely. That attitude also contributed to the tech crash of 2000/01.
Functionality people, FUNCTIONALITY!!!!!
murray @ Jul 28th 2007 2:03PM
Screw appearance. All I care about in a remote is functionality and usability.
Arnie @ Jul 28th 2007 2:36PM
I am sorry but most remotes today have standard set of features which are kinda given. Functionality is of course important but so is the look. This remote is even a bother to hold for someone like me who has relatively small hands.
Also, the feature set of this remote is pretty much on par for its price range.
So my point was why cant they make it look a bit more interesting and comfortable to hold. At least the logitech remotes have a curved shape which is comfortable to hold. This thing is plain fugly.