Wow. do you even know that p stands for progressive, as in the scanning? The difference between 1080p and 1080i is virtually undetectable, unless you are watching something very fast paced, in which case interlaced is better. Learn what you're talking about BEFORE someone lectures you.
Interlaced is better for faster paced action movies and fast games. It just seems to run more smoothly. In my opinion. Maybe I'm not paying too much attention to quality when concentrating on a fast paced piece of media. But, in retrospect, when was progressive ever noticeably better than interlaced? Hmmm?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
_V3ndetta_ @ May 1st 2007 4:49PM
Wow. do you even know that p stands for progressive, as in the scanning? The difference between 1080p and 1080i is virtually undetectable, unless you are watching something very fast paced, in which case interlaced is better. Learn what you're talking about BEFORE someone lectures you.
Joe Smith @ May 1st 2007 5:47PM
wait a minute. with all due respect, when did interlaced ever get BETTER than progressive?
_V3ndetta_ @ May 2nd 2007 9:26PM
Interlaced is better for faster paced action movies and fast games. It just seems to run more smoothly. In my opinion. Maybe I'm not paying too much attention to quality when concentrating on a fast paced piece of media. But, in retrospect, when was progressive ever noticeably better than interlaced? Hmmm?
ErzNerz @ May 1st 2007 9:30PM
Yeah, i think you got that a little backwards there buddy. And motion usually has nothing to do with it.