Wow. do you even know that p stands for progressive, as in the scanning? The difference between 1080p and 1080i is virtually undetectable, unless you are watching something very fast paced, in which case interlaced is better. Learn what you're talking about BEFORE someone lectures you.
Interlaced is better for faster paced action movies and fast games. It just seems to run more smoothly. In my opinion. Maybe I'm not paying too much attention to quality when concentrating on a fast paced piece of media. But, in retrospect, when was progressive ever noticeably better than interlaced? Hmmm?
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Wow. do you even know that p stands for progressive, as in the scanning? The difference between 1080p and 1080i is virtually undetectable, unless you are watching something very fast paced, in which case interlaced is better. Learn what you're talking about BEFORE someone lectures you.
wait a minute. with all due respect, when did interlaced ever get BETTER than progressive?
Interlaced is better for faster paced action movies and fast games. It just seems to run more smoothly. In my opinion. Maybe I'm not paying too much attention to quality when concentrating on a fast paced piece of media. But, in retrospect, when was progressive ever noticeably better than interlaced? Hmmm?
Yeah, i think you got that a little backwards there buddy. And motion usually has nothing to do with it.