That's kinda my point. $700+ to extend the range is painful when they could have just engineered good ol' coax cable to handle 1080p, HDCP, -and- a much longer cable length. But, that wouldn't have brought in nearly as much cash for the licensees or licensors with a new market for now needed devices like the one you just linked.
I see your point but if you have the dough for everything to connect to, 700 to connect isn't too big of a deal. Still not sure how they can get HDCP through Ethernet, surprised someone hasn't hacked that yet.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Brett-
That's kinda my point. $700+ to extend the range is painful when they could have just engineered good ol' coax cable to handle 1080p, HDCP, -and- a much longer cable length. But, that wouldn't have brought in nearly as much cash for the licensees or licensors with a new market for now needed devices like the one you just linked.
Dave
I see your point but if you have the dough for everything to connect to, 700 to connect isn't too big of a deal. Still not sure how they can get HDCP through Ethernet, surprised someone hasn't hacked that yet.