That's kinda my point. $700+ to extend the range is painful when they could have just engineered good ol' coax cable to handle 1080p, HDCP, -and- a much longer cable length. But, that wouldn't have brought in nearly as much cash for the licensees or licensors with a new market for now needed devices like the one you just linked.
I see your point but if you have the dough for everything to connect to, 700 to connect isn't too big of a deal. Still not sure how they can get HDCP through Ethernet, surprised someone hasn't hacked that yet.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Dave @ Apr 27th 2007 5:05PM
Brett-
That's kinda my point. $700+ to extend the range is painful when they could have just engineered good ol' coax cable to handle 1080p, HDCP, -and- a much longer cable length. But, that wouldn't have brought in nearly as much cash for the licensees or licensors with a new market for now needed devices like the one you just linked.
Dave
Brett @ Apr 29th 2007 2:31PM
I see your point but if you have the dough for everything to connect to, 700 to connect isn't too big of a deal. Still not sure how they can get HDCP through Ethernet, surprised someone hasn't hacked that yet.