[Arthur Nonamiss @ Jan 8th 2007 11:54PM]

You all realize you're saying "dang, that's a good picture" when looking at a picture of the display on your existing monitor. You can't really judge a display based upon looking at pictures of it on your display. Anyone saying that this picture is the best ever is just a Sony fanboy. I'm not saying the picture sucks, but unless you're at CES, you have no idea whatsoever.

[crzyjamaican46 @ Jan 9th 2007 12:01AM]

Just for the record I was wowed by the specs presented and facts that most of us geeks at engadget already know about oled's. Ken does bring up a good point though. Has Sony finally solved the blue oled lifespan issue that has been holding back this display technology. Prediction on sizes for next year anyone or prices? Engadget we need a responce and an update on this post. How did the display look in person. Was it really that great or do i hav a hard on for no reason at all.

[codywatson @ Jan 9th 2007 12:59AM]

I hope you aren't saying that the picture is worse than in the photos. Just in case: How are our monitors increasing the quality of the image? That defies all logic, as our monitors could only degrade the quality.

Oh yes, and I do agree that the photos are pretty well useless, as they are limited by our current monitors. However, the specs should give *some* idea of what a sweet display this is. (and is likely fuelling the swoon)

[Deluxe @ Jan 9th 2007 12:33AM]

What people are saying "Damn that's awesome!" to is the comparison in the images they're seeing to the other objects. You can't say "Damn that's a huge pyramid!" without actually being NEXT to the pyramid? I'd say a camel standing next to the base of the pyramid is justification enough.

But, I would still like to see it in person ;).